Archive for the ‘sellers’ Category
Wayback Wednesday… Recovery?
- Image by kenjonbro via Flickr
Recovery… In it or do we need to go to it? That was my question two years ago this week… and it is STILL a valid question. And two years ago, I don’t think there were many people (including me) that were expecting the housing slump to last this long.
But here we are, not knowing if a bottom to the market has been established or if there is more blood that needs to run in the streets.
At least now, more of us in the real estate community have figured out that stimulus and incentives aren’t the answer… JOBS are the answer. There are too many potential buyers out there that are worried about the security of their jobs. Demand can’t rise until buyers don’t feel threatened.
And that means that the Supply side of Supply/Demand will be out of whack… even thought the supplies have be mostly dropping for well over a year (compared to the previous year). And even though supply has been coming down, there have been reports of a wave of foreclosures just out of sight over the horizon (those reports have been with us for well over a year, too).
On the flip side, there are some pretty good deals. Mortgage rates are ROCKING… I heard a report today that rates hadn’t been this low in 60 years. If you ARE in a position to buy, it might be the best time in a generation. If not, I understand…
Related articles by Zemanta
- Wayback Wednesday… Don’t be Dumb Like a Bank (lanebailey.com)
- Wayback Wednesday… Add on or Get out? (lanebailey.com)
View CommentsFlashback Friday… Are You Ready to Rumble?
- Image via Wikipedia
Competition. If you are a seller in this market… and for the last several years… you have been in competition. If you weren’t… your competitors were, and you can’t win the race if you weren’t running.
If you are a buyer in this market, you have still been in competition. Same story as above. And while there is a LOT of inventory (less than the last couple of years, but still a lot), the deals aren’t on every corner. You have to grab them when they pop up…
The bottom line is that opportunities are out there for both buyers and sellers, but they aren’t so plentiful as to be squandered.
I wrote a post last year about this very thing… Drop in and take a look.
View CommentsWayback Wednesday… Why the Hurry?
- Image via Wikipedia
This hasn’t changed… unless it has become MORE important.
Looking through listings is kind of like wading through a sea of REOs (bank owned properties) and short sales (properties on their way to becoming bank owned, barring a miracle). And one thing uniting these listings is that they are generally marketed VERY weakly. Scant pictures, minimal descriptions and even non-existent directions to the home.
So, when a property comes on the market that is well photographed, marketed and with a well written description, it stands out.
Two years ago I wrote about agents rushing to get listings onto the market… before things like photographs could even be sorted out. Then and now, buyers reject properties without photos. Seldom do they come back to see if the listing has photos updated on it… unless they have moved past everything else on the market.
Here is the original post…
Related articles by Zemanta
- Wayback Wednesday… Don’t Hide in the Sand… (lanebailey.com)
- Wayback Wednesday… Don’t be Dumb Like a Bank (lanebailey.com)
- Wayback Wednesday… SPICY! (lanebailey.com)
- Wayback Wednesday… Add on or Get out? (lanebailey.com)
- Wayback Wednesday… The Dirty Little Secret… (lanebailey.com)
View CommentsThis is what I feared… Gwinnett Market Report – July, 2010
- Image by lane.bailey via Flickr
I have been kind of expecting this, but of course it will take a couple of months to confirm…
The Tax Credit did not kick the Gwinnett Market into gear…
Instead, its expiration killed sales. Looking over the last few months of sales we see that for 2010, sales were (compared to 2009):
- January – down 10.9%
- February – up 1.7%
- March – up 10.1%
- April – up 14.1%
- May – up 17.3%
- June – down 0.8%
- July – down 26.2%
As we look over these numbers, there are a few things to keep in mind… To start with, the July numbers will likely get a little better. Although sales are supposed to be reported within 48 hours of closing, there are always stragglers that take a few weeks to make it into the reports. Contracts had to be written by April 30th, and sales here usually only take 30-45 days to close. That would be why sales were up in May, but not in June… those sales were likely closed. I didn’t see a lot of buyers playing chicken with the contract dates.
All isn’t doom and gloom… Inventories are down a bit from last year. This is helping to keep the absorption rates at a reasonable level. But they are still decelerating.
Look for specific reports over the next couple of weeks for Lilburn, Lawrenceville, Duluth, Suwanee, Sugar Hill, Buford and Norcross.
View CommentsCool Garages… Yahoo
- Image by Elsie esq. via Flickr
Yahoo Real Estate had an article about cool garages a few days ago. They focused on some very high end homes… with some really cool garages. Nice pictures.
I tend to focus on garages that are a little more within the budget realms of [reality]. Not that I would mind representing $10m properties… but there aren’t that many opportunities, and it isn’t a circle I travel in a lot. Luckily, I love the people I work with, buyers and sellers that share a love of cars, Jeeps, trucks and motorcycles… just like me.
Anyway, hit the link for some great garage shots… and if you are looking for an agent that actually WANTS to check to see what the garage is like when touring a home, give me a call…
View CommentsSubscribe for FREE
All My Info
Click here to...
Mouse over this...
Where I Work
Contact Lane…
Lane’s New Video Channel
I have just struck a deal with The Video Connector to provide video content for my sites. Look for lots of cool videos from Tara and TJ from Reel Productions. They have been the providers of my video tours for a couple of years now, and really have a handle on the real estate market. Enjoy.
Testimonials
What do my clients think?
