Last week I posted an infographic from Active Rain saying that Real Estate is Back… Here is another one from 29doors that makes it look like in Georgia, it isn’t so much. But, looking at the market reports for Gwinnett, as well as Case-Schiller numbers for the Atlanta statistical area, prices look to be up year over year by more than 9%. That tells me that there are some places in Georgia that are still pretty slammed. What do you think?
Market stats for Norcross GA, January, 2013 indicate that there were 138 properties on the market, up 8 from last month. Overall, there is about a 3.3 month supply of properties. 
The last year has been fairy strong… it hasn’t slowed much, if at all. January saw 36 sales, on par compared to the 36 for December, and down a little compared to the 40 for January last year.
In the sub-$200k arena, there were 76 listings, with about 2.6 month supply. Sales are up from last month and down from a year ago in this segment, which is the main driver of sales in this area (28 v 22 in Dec12 & 33 Jan12). For the last twenty-two months, the AR has been tilted in favor of sellers. This still looks like one of the strongest price/area segment in Gwinnett County, GA. At well under a 3 month A/R, this is VERY strong for sellers.
Between $200k and $400k, there were 41 listings for sale, and about 3.6 months of supply. This segment had been weakening for the last few months. But, the 8 sales was up from last year’s 6 sales, but was a little below last month’s 11 sales. Even though it isn’t as gangbusters as some of the other areas, it is certainly better than the 28 months of inventory we had in December, 2010. I’m was waiting for this segment to stop bouncing around so much. It does seem to be closer to finding its feet, though.
From $400k to $600k, there were 19 homes on the market. The Absorption Rate is around 9.5 months. The AR had been fairly steady all summer, then shot WAY up in September/October. January’s 0 sales were flat from the 3 last month and from last year’s 1 sale. This had actually been a pretty good area for homes in this price range to sell… The good news is that it only takes a few sales to put it back in a balanced range long term. In June we were at just 5.1 months of inventory and three months ago it was 42 months…
The range from $800k to $1m, there was 0 home listed on the market and 0 sales in December. There were no sales last year. Unfortunately there isn’t enough data for a good A/R number.
Above $1m, there was 1 property listed. But because of the smaller numbers of sales, the absorption rate could be significantly impacted by just a couple of sales. There is simply not enough activity for an A/R figure. The last sale was January 2011.
Norcross, GA is a suburb of Atlanta in Gwinnett County. The population is 2000 was 8,410 but that only included the area inside the city limits, and it has seen tremendous growth since that census. The City of Norcross revamped their old town a long time ago, and it has served as a model for other towns in the area. It is also home to Meadow Creek and Norcross High Schools. One of the things that Norcross is known for locally is the beautiful older homes in the downtown area. They have maintained their historic flair quite successfully.
I have a page dedicated to Norcross Market Data.
I have been saying it for a few months now… and it has been pretty apparent in the Gwinnett County area. Real Estate is back. This nifty infographic from Active Rain, where I am an Ambassador (I help other agents more effectively blog and such…) shows that agents across the country are really starting to feel confident that real estate is again strong.
As mentioned here during the depths of the down-turn, we wouldn’t really know that the market had turned until it was done. And just because I, and a few thousand of my real estate peers feel like real estate has returned to normal doesn’t mean that it can’t be derailed. But, for now…
Data provided by ActiveRain, the #1 social community for real estate professionals.
Market stats for Norcross GA, December, 2012 indicate that there were 130 properties on the market, down 15 from last month. Overall, there is about a 2.9 month supply of properties. The last year has been fairy strong… it hasn’t slowed much, if at all. December saw 36 sales, below par compared to the 55 for November, and compared to the 53 for December last year.
In the sub-$200k arena, there were 74 listings, with about 2.5 month supply. Sales are down from last month and down from a year ago in this segment, which is the main driver of sales in this area (22 v 46 in Dec11 & 37 Nov12). For the last eleven months, the AR has been tilted in favor of sellers. This still looks like one of the strongest price/area segment in Gwinnett County, GA. At well under a 3 month A/R, this is VERY strong for sellers.
Between $200k and $400k, there were 38 listings for sale, and about 3.1 months of supply. This segment had been weakening for the last few months. But, the 11 sales was up from last year’s 4 sales, but was a little below last month’s 15 sales. Even though it isn’t as gangbusters as some of the other areas, it is certainly better than the 28 months of inventory we had in December, 2010. I’m still waiting for this segment to stop bouncing around so much, though.
From $400k to $600k, there were 16 homes on the market. The Absorption Rate is around 6.9 months. The AR had been fairly steady for months, then shot WAY up in January. December’s 3 sales were flat from the 3 last month and up from last year’s 2 sales. This had actually been a pretty good area for homes in this price range to sell… The good news is that it only takes a few sales to put it back in a balanced range long term. In June we were at just 5.1 months of inventory and two months ago it was 42 months…
The range from $800k to $1m, there was 0 home listed on the market and 0 sales in December. There were no sales last year. Unfortunately there isn’t enough data for a good A/R number.
Above $1m, there was 1 property listed. But because of the smaller numbers of sales, the absorption rate could be significantly impacted by just a couple of sales. There is simply not enough activity for an A/R figure. The last sale was January 2011.
Norcross, GA is a suburb of Atlanta in Gwinnett County. The population is 2000 was 8,410 but that only included the area inside the city limits, and it has seen tremendous growth since that census. The City of Norcross revamped their old town a long time ago, and it has served as a model for other towns in the area. It is also home to Meadow Creek and Norcross High Schools. One of the things that Norcross is known for locally is the beautiful older homes in the downtown area. They have maintained their historic flair quite successfully.
I have a page dedicated to Norcross Market Data.
I’m making a big change for the market reports from January, 2013, forward.
English: Chart showing the median and average sales prices of new homes sold in the United States by month/year. Based off of US Census Median and Average Sales Price of New Houses Sold Data. Please note that the sales price includes land. Also, the average from 1963-1974 inclusively, is annual, and not monthly. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Instead of tracking average Days on Market (DoM), I’m going to track median DoM. It might not seem like much of a change, but I’m seeing segments where the average is 100+ days, while the median 50 or 60 days. The reason for this is that the average is giving too much weight to a few outlier properties that might have 500 or more days on the market.
A while back, FMLS, the primary provider of the data I analyze, changed the way THEY calculated DoM. The started tracking the property for total days on market instead of just the most recent listing.
While FMLS’s policy change made the data more accurate for individual listings, it also made it much less relevant for the market trends. The median data is more accurate for market trends because it lowers the effects of the outliers.
I discontinued posting the DoM data in the market reports a while back because it ceased being useful, but I have continued to track it. Moving forward, while I still probably won’t include the DoM data directly in the reports, I will allude to it as I see trends develop.
Enjoy…
